Search for: "Marshall v. California Supreme Courts et al" Results 1 - 20 of 50
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2009, 12:29 pm
Opinion below (Supreme Court of Michigan) Petition for certiorari Cases involving lawyers from Akin Gump or Howe & Russell (listed without regard to likelihood of being granted): Docket: 08-846 Title: Navajo Nation, et al. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 12:16 pm
Castaneda, et al. (08-1529) and Henneford v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am by Francisco Macías
  However, when the case went before the Supreme Court of Virginia (Loving v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:30 am by Steve McConnell
Supreme Court – even Marshall and Brennan had to agree with Rehnquist et al. that the evidence against the hapless criminal defendant should not be suppressed.) [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:40 pm by John Elwood
  Certiorari stage documents: Opinion below (California Supreme Court) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Title: Messerschmidt v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 6:28 am
Stone, et al., Constitutional Law (Aspen Law & Business, 4th ed., 2001): 331-419. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:43 am by Arthur F. Coon
”” Significantly in light of the California Supreme Court’s pending review of the First District’s own seemingly contrary decision in Berkeley Hillside Preservation, et al. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm by Christa Culver
(forthcoming)Amicus brief of the American Civil Rights UnionAmicus brief of the National Association of Home Builders et al. [read post]